1992 Acura NSX vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura NSX would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Acura NSX (272 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 1992 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Acura NSX. (284 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Acura NSX | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Acura | Renault |
| Model | NSX | Clio |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 272 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
