1992 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (120 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Because 1952 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (152 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 155 | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 155 | C-Type |
Year Released | 1992 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |