1992 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 1981 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 752 kg more than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Because 1981 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 155 | 1981 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 155 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1773 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1204 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3090 mm |