1992 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (120 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Because 2000 Jaguar XKA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XKA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 691 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (152 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 155 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 155 | XKA |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 843 Nm |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 299 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2590 mm |