1992 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (120 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 155 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 155 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |