1992 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155. (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Alfa Romeo 155.
Because 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 (291 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 155 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 155 | CTS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 259 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |