1992 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1980 Alpina B6
To start off, 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1980 Alpina B6.
Because 1980 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1980 Alpina B6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpina |
| Model | 164 | B6 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |
