1992 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 (207 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 (270 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1992 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 164 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2685 mm |