1992 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1992 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1992 Alfa Romeo 33. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alfa Romeo 33. (113 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alfa Romeo 33.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 33 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.2 mm | 101.2 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |