1992 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ (209 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ. (245 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alfa Romeo RZ.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alfa Romeo RZ | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | RZ | Colorado |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |