1992 Alpina B 12 vs. 2000 Kia Retona
To start off, 2000 Kia Retona is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Retona weights approximately 76 kg more than 1992 Alpina B 12.
Because 2000 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Retona. (205 Nm). This means 1992 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Retona.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpina B 12 | 2000 Kia Retona | |
Make | Alpina | Kia |
Model | B 12 | Retona |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2370 mm |