1992 Alpina B 12 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 156 kg more than 1992 Alpina B 12.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (426 Nm). This means 1992 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Alpina B 12 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Alpina | Toyota |
| Model | B 12 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 469 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3270 mm |
