1992 Alpina B 12 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 322 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (617 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alpina B 12. (469 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alpina B 12.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpina B 12 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Alpina | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | B 12 | E |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 617 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4868 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2071 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2874 mm |