1992 Alpina B6 vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Alpina B6 (238 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Alpina B6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 175 kg more than 1992 Alpina B6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alpina B6. (293 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alpina B6.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpina B6 | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Alpina | Holden |
Model | B6 | UTE |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2752 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |