1992 Alpina B6 vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,752 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Alpina B6 (238 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Marcos TS. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Alpina B6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Marcos TS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alpina B6 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alpina B6 (293 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Marcos TS. (224 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Alpina B6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Marcos TS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpina B6 | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | Alpina | Marcos |
Model | B6 | TS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2752 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2230 mm |