1992 Alpine A 610 vs. 1999 Audi A2
To start off, 1999 Audi A2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpine A 610. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpine A 610 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alpine A 610 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 247 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alpine A 610 weights approximately 544 kg more than 1999 Audi A2.
Because 1992 Alpine A 610 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Alpine A 610. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alpine A 610 (357 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi A2. (320 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Alpine A 610 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpine A 610 | 1999 Audi A2 | |
Make | Alpine | Audi |
Model | A 610 | A2 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1414 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1560 mm |