1992 Alpine A 610 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpine A 610. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpine A 610 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Alpine A 610 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Alpine A 610. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Alpine A 610. (357 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Alpine A 610.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Alpine A 610 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Alpine | Holden |
Model | A 610 | HRT |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |