1992 Alpine A 610 vs. 2011 Mazda 2

To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Alpine A 610. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Alpine A 610 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Alpine A 610 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Alpine A 610 (247 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Alpine A 610 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Alpine A 610 weights approximately 368 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Alpine A 610 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Alpine A 610. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Alpine A 610 (357 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Alpine A 610 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications: