1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2003 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2003 Ford Lynx is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 178 more horse power than 2003 Ford Lynx. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Lynx.
Because 1992 Ascari FG-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ascari FG-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ascari FG-T has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Lynx has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Lynx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ascari FG-T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ascari FG-T | 2003 Ford Lynx | |
| Make | Ascari | Ford |
| Model | FG-T | Lynx |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
