1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2004 Audi RS6
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (445 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1992 Ascari FG-T. (286 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ascari FG-T.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ascari FG-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ascari FG-T has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2004 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ascari FG-T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ascari FG-T | 2004 Audi RS6 | |
Make | Ascari | Audi |
Model | FG-T | RS6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 445 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |