1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2004 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2004 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Buick LaCrosse. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2004 Buick LaCrosse.
Because 1992 Ascari FG-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ascari FG-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ascari FG-T | 2004 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Ascari | Buick |
Model | FG-T | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |