1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2005 Ford Ikon
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ikon. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ikon.
Because 1992 Ascari FG-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ascari FG-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ascari FG-T has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ikon has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ikon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ascari FG-T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ascari FG-T | 2005 Ford Ikon | |
| Make | Ascari | Ford |
| Model | FG-T | Ikon |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
