1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1992 Ascari FG-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ascari FG-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ascari FG-T | 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Ascari | Chevrolet |
Model | FG-T | Malibu |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 240 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |