1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1992 Ascari FG-T. (286 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Ascari FG-T.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ascari FG-T | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ascari | Cadillac |
| Model | FG-T | CTS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 304 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
