1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ascari FG-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ascari FG-T has automatic transmission and 2011 Chevrolet Orlando has manual transmission. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ascari FG-T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ascari FG-T | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Ascari | Chevrolet |
| Model | FG-T | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 139 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 281 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
