1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ascari FG-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ascari FG-T | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Ascari | Volvo |
| Model | FG-T | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
