1992 Ascari FG-T vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ascari FG-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ascari FG-T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ascari FG-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ascari FG-T (286 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC90. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ascari FG-T should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Because 1992 Ascari FG-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ascari FG-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ascari FG-T has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ascari FG-T will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ascari FG-T | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ascari | Volvo |
Model | FG-T | XC90 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |