1992 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1992 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,338 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Aston Martin Virage (344 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 866 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Aston Martin Virage (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1992 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: