1992 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1992 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Aston Martin Virage (330 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Aston Martin Virage (475 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 1992 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Aston Martin Virage | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Virage | 280 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5341 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
