1992 Audi 100 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | 100 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1950 mm |
