1992 Audi 100 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Because 1963 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | 100 | Herald |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |