1992 Audi 100 vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1965 AC Cobra. (267 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1965 AC Cobra.
Because 1965 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Cobra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Audi | AC |
Model | 100 | Cobra |
Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1250 mm |