1992 Audi 100 vs. 1965 Austin A 60
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 1965 Austin A 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | 100 | A 60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1621 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
