1992 Audi 100 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 100 | HD |
Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |