1992 Audi 100 vs. 1968 Skoda 1000 MB
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1000 MB would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB.
Because 1968 Skoda 1000 MB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. (75 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 1968 Skoda 1000 MB | |
| Make | Audi | Skoda |
| Model | 100 | 1000 MB |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 47 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 75 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 121 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
