1992 Audi 100 vs. 1969 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1992 Audi 100 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Because 1969 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 1969 Mazda 1000 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | 100 | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
