1992 Audi 100 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Sable. (152 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | 100 | Sable |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |