1992 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Bristol Blenheim

To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100.

Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: