1992 Audi 100 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (64 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Audi | Subaru |
Model | 100 | R2 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |