1992 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | CTS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |