1992 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 567 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100.
Because 2004 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 590 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Audi | Lotec |
Model | 100 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 844 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |