1992 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Vector M12
To start off, 2004 Vector M12 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100.
Because 2004 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 2004 Vector M12 | |
| Make | Audi | Vector |
| Model | 100 | M12 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 484 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 576 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1140 mm |
