1992 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2120 mm |