1992 Audi 100 vs. 2008 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (306 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100.
Because 2008 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan 350Z. (364 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan 350Z.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2008 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 364 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |