1992 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 100 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |