1992 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Navara. (172 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Navara.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Navara (403 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 100. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 100 | Navara |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 403 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
