1992 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1992 Audi 100. (172 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 228 kg more than 1992 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |
