1992 Audi 80 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | 60 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 5671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1920 mm |