1992 Audi 80 vs. 1952 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Humber Super Snipe (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 483 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1952 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Audi | Humber |
| Model | 80 | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 4139 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1753 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
