1992 Audi 80 vs. 1959 Austin A 99
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 99. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 99 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1992 Audi 80.
Because 1959 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1959 Austin A 99 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | 80 | A 99 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1530 kg |